rating: 4 of 5 stars
Because I loved “The Thirteenth Tale” my contact at Barnes and Noble was sure I would like this book by Bohjalian. He had heard the two books had many things in common. Unfortunately, they don’t. Fortunately, I liked this one for much different reasons. Read the rest of this entry ?
Archive for May, 2008
rating: 4 of 5 stars
At breakfast the other day, a friend of mine and I were talking about some of our goals for physical fitness. His are quite extensive and mine are … less so. I felt convicted that I should be pushing myself more. In conversation, we got around to spiritual goals we have for the summer. The conclusion we both reached is that we had really just counted on “winging it” as we have often done.
Perhaps winging it will produce for our souls what winging it produces for my body – i.e. Not much change. What spiritual goals might you be setting for this summer?
This is for golfers primarily. We need a word for that putt you take after the putt you missed you were sure you would make. We have all done it. The five-footer that had your name on it pretended like it didn’t know you. Then, after you miss it, forswear grounding your putter on the green in case there is a marshall lurking in the bushes, you pull back the putt and try it again. Everyone knows you won’t count this one, but your ego and desire to improve (are they the same thing?) requires that you try it again. Twice is probably the limit for such a putt. If you don’t make it by then, it was not to be.
But, returning to the question: What should we call that putt? I would like to hear from my golfing lurkers on this one.
The Governor of Alabama is seeing the value of churches (trust a bible belt state to see this one). Here is what this news article says:
Ala. (RNS) Gov. Bob Riley on Tuesday (May 20) asked Alabama churches to shoulder the burden of caring for newly released inmates, saying the state lacks the flexibility and funds to help them successfully re-enter society.
Leaders from churches and charitable groups were asked to provide a wide range of services to former inmates, including employment assistance, housing, clothing, health care and cash.
Riley said the state’s churches can rise to the challenge just as they do in response to natural disasters such as hurricanes.
My only doubt is that just as churches get involved in this, someone will cry “separation of church and state”, it will be challenged in the courts and then all the hard work will be for nought. What do you think?
Everyone on the planet gets a chance at rehab, no matter what they’ve done. Judas Iscariot, the so-called “Traitor Apostle” is no exception. I remember sitting in a West End London Theater in 1973 with my family as we watched the mega-hit, “Godspell”. In that recounting of the gospel story of Jesus, Judas is cast as a misunderstood maladroit that just wanted everyone to get along…except the Romans of course.
Later that summer, Weber’s “Jesus Christ, Superstar” made it onto the movie screens. In that retelling, Judas is a sympathetic worrier, best friend type, who is actually made the scapegoat of the entire thing by being tricked into thinking Jesus wants him to be the Betrayer.
In 2006, National Geographic published an article on the newly translated “Gospel of Judas”, an ancient Egyptian manuscript that tells a different story of Judas. They released the translation at the same time as a special documentary and a website splash. All of the media told the same story. Judas was Jesus’ best friend who volunteered to be the scapegoat. Jesus liked him better than the rest and as everyone knows, only a good friend will do your dirty work if you need something done.
As soon as the television special ended, many Coptic scholars downloaded the original document and the translation. Most of them were appalled. Listen to this description in the Chronicle-Review concerning April DeConick, a professor of biblical studies at Rice University:
She started the next day on her own translation of the Coptic transcription, also posted on the National Geographic Web site. That’s when she came across what she considered a major, almost unbelievable error. It had to do with the translation of the word “daimon,” which Jesus uses to address Judas. The National Geographic team translates this as “spirit,” an unusual choice and inconsistent with translations of other early Christian texts, where it is usually rendered as “demon.” In this passage, however, Jesus’ calling Judas a demon would completely alter the meaning. “O 13th spirit, why do you try so hard?” becomes “O 13th demon, why do you try so hard?” A gentle inquiry turns into a vicious rebuke.
Then there’s the number 13. The Gospel of Judas is thought to have been written by a sect of Gnostics known as Sethians, for whom the number 13 would indicate a realm ruled by the demon Ialdabaoth. Calling someone a demon from the 13th realm would not be a compliment. In another passage, the National Geographic translation says that Judas “would ascend to the holy generation.” But DeConick says it’s clear from the transcription that a negative has been left out and that Judas will not ascend to the holy generation (this error has been corrected in the second edition). DeConick also objected to a phrase that says Judas has been “set apart for the holy generation.” She argues it should be translated “set apart from the holy generation” — again, the opposite meaning. In the later critical edition, the National Geographic translators offer both as legitimate possibilities.
In subsequent months, it has been shown that this Gospel could not possibly have been written by Judas, for it refers to events in the second century. In fact, no one ever claimed it was written by Judas. It was penned by a group of Gnostics around 150 A.D. and their purpose was to show that Judas was not actually a man, but a spirit force sent to guide Jesus through his spiritual path. In the last year, no one talks much more about this Gospel or the books written to laud it, for it stands as a monument to what the media can do to historical truth.
So why does everyone from Andrew Lloyd Weber to Harvard University want to paint Judas in a better light? As with anything, there is no one theory that stands for all. But here is my take on it. People feel uncomfortable with anyone being the worst bad guy in any situation. Except for the most cruel and hate-filled people of history (Hitler, Genghis Khan, Frank Burns) we react with a certain amount of sympathy for those who mess up but still have much in common with us.
Judas is painted in the Bible as greedy, opinionated, wanting the Romans to be overthrown, and impatient with Jesus’ program. He also doesn’t like others to be in the spotlight apparently. I can survey my life in the last ten years and see greed, a bevy of opinions, wanting megachurches to be overthrown, and impatient with Jesus’ program for my life. In fact, I’m not sure I don’t resemble Judas more than I care to admit, even on a bad day.
However, believe it or not, Judas is not painted as just a Betrayer in the Bible. He actually repented of it later and gave the money back. No, the Bible shows that Judas was destroyed by the belief that he could never come back to God. Think about this: Both Judas and Peter let Jesus down big time. Peter ends up being the leader in the church and Judas has his intestines littering a field. But they both committed equally heinous crimes against their friendship with Jesus. What was the difference?
Judas hung himself because he believed the lie that it could never change. Peter jumped in the water, swam to shore and somehow came back to his friend. This is the difference. Give up hope and there is not much God can do. Keep the door open to God, no matter how badly you fail, and God can still get his stuff done with you.
If we really rehab Judas, he would be Peter.
I am sorry for the fuzzy quality of this picture, but all I had time to do was grab my camera phone and make this. On thursday afternoon, I had the awesome privilege of taking part in the ordination interview for Ted R. who will soon be serving the Lord as a military chaplain. Ted was interviewed for 3 grueling hours as we went through every aspect of biblical knowledge, theology and practical ministry. Ted came through it all with flying colors (after all, these colors don’t run) and exemplified himself as a man that can lead other men in their spiritual walk.
This Memorial Day, remember Ted and his wife as they embark on this courageous career. Pray for them and their three kids that they can make the transition from Church life (Youth Pastor for 14 years) to military life. This picture is Ted receiving the oath of office from a senior chaplain. God bless you Ted!
In actual words…What Devotions Did Jesus Do? By “devotions”, I mean that spiritual moment or time when we spend time with God, whether by reading Scripture, praying, worshipping or even appreciating aspects of his creation. It can include disciplines (like Contemplation or Solitude), attitudes (Confession or Thanksgiving) and even actions (Journaling, kneeling, imagining). These are all human creations to attempt to solidify our tenuous-feeling working relationship with our Creator.
Jesus, the one who was both God and Man, spent time solidifying that Daddy-Son intimacy. Since he is completely human as we are, he felt those moments of isolation and responded to them with discipline and a process of thinking through the day. So what “devotional life” did Jesus have?
My favorite glimpse into his life with Abba comes in Matthew 4. I won’t take time to deal with the entire section, but the first part of Jesus’ encounter with the Father of Lies (satan) in the wilderness shows us something of his life with God. Jesus has just spent 40 days alone with the Spirit of God. This time followed his incredible filling with the Spirit at his baptism and the earth-shaking voice of the Father who said “This is my beloved son in whom I am well pleased”. But that was 40 days ago, and as all of us face, Jesus cannot recapture the words spoken over a month ago. Every day has a new impact and even yesterday’s exciting victories ring hollow in the face of attack and hunger.
In verses 2 and 3 of Matthew 4 it says
2After fasting forty days and forty nights, he was hungry. 3The tempter came to him and said, “If you are the Son of God, tell these stones to become bread.”
The word “tempter” means “tester”. As I noted a few weeks ago, this is satan’s role: he is the Proctor, he delivers our tests. We prove who we are through these tests. He designs the tests individually for each of us. This test was for Jesus. It was not as simple as it sounds. Jesus heard the Father, saw the Spirit come down on him. Felt the baptism. But our humanity is frail. He cannot hold onto that memory. Now satan wants to see if he will doubt the Truth of Abba’s words.
Here is what Jesus answered:
4Jesus answered, “It is written: ‘Man does not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God.
His answer can seem glib on paper, but it reveals so much at the first level down below the bare words. First, this quote is from Deuteronomy 8. In fact, every answer that Jesus gives to the Proctor is from Deuteronomy, chapters 6-8. They didn’t have chapters in those days, so let’s just say it came from the same general region in the same historical book. Coincidence? Hardly. You don’t have these answers unless they are recently familiar to you. I get a kick out of teachers who look at this section and tell people this is a takeaway suggesting we memorize Scripture. Don’t bother. The Proctor knows the Bible better than you do. Simply quoting the Bible back to him when your heart hasn’t processed Truth and embraced it won’t pass this test.
Second, Jesus’ understanding of the Truth in Deuteronomy 8 was deeper than just quoting something to do with Bread. The passage in Deut. 8 speaks of Manna and humbling. To go out every day and collect bread in the desert and have to rely completely on God to feed them was humbling in the sense that they had to completely rely on him. Jesus got that! He is telling the Proctor that if God tells him to turn the stones into bread, he will do it. But not a second before. What an incredible answer. He also uses the word “word” correctly in Greek. The Greek word is rhema, which means a message intended for a specific reason, situation or person. If God told Jesus directly to turn the stones into bread that day, for a particular purpose and for God’s glory, then, and only then, would Jesus do it.
Do you prepare yourself in the Scriptures that way? It means bringing the Spirit into that time and preparing your heart with Truth that can be lived (as opposed to Truth that is just memorized to win a discussion). Then when the test comes, you will pass the essay questions as well as the fill in the blank ones.
I love the group that hangs at our church. It is an awesome group doing the Journey together. But I have to give props when they are deserved. I was swinging through a few blogs I love and their links lead me to a few more links and then I found this church. It’s the New Spring Church in Anderson, SC. Here is a sampling from this blog page recounting the Mother’s Day events:
- Today we saw the church be the church!
- We gave a handicapped accessible van away to a mom & her family.
- We gave away a house to a single mom…AND informed her that we were paying her utility bills for the next year to help her get on her feet.
It gives me a lot of ideas, and maybe you too. What would you give away next year on Mother’s Day to a deserving mother?
At least, this video, produced to give some idea of Oprah’s religious beliefs, claims she leads the largest church in the world. Though I wouldn’t go so far as to call her group a “church”, she certainly wields a lot of influence. Her particular brand of religion is actually called “New Thought” and one should research it carefully before accepting Oprah’s belief system carte blanche.
Years ago, I was having lunch with one of my mentors and he began talking of the concept of Gift Transference. Paul mentioned how much he hated when people did it to him, but despised it even more when he did it to others. He explained what it was, but I confess I didn’t truly understand it for awhile. I don’t think I grasped its nature until someone did it to me, and then I realized how much I laid it on others.
So what is gift transference? Simply, it is the act of assuming that others should desire all the gifts and callings of God that we possess. In addition, it is the tendency to believe that our own ministry and burdens should be of primary importance to everyone. By this definition, Gift Transference is temporary self-absorption. With some people, it becomes permanent. Like most manifestations of self-absorbed Pride, Gift Transference is so hard to see in ourselves and incredibly annoying when we encounter it in others.
For me, the learning process started with a revival. I don’t mean “revival meetings” where we announce to the world on a bumper sticker or a mailer that God is going to show up on particular dates and at a place of our choosing. I mean real revival, where God shows up wherever He feels like it, whenever He desires, and turns the Church upside down. Usually in revival there is a lot of repentance, miracles, signs and wonders and a lot of God’s Presence. This revival turned my world inside out and I had to rethink everything I knew about God’s Power and Presence. It may sound strange to say, but after 18 months of revival going on in our town (a time when over 400 people became Christians in our congregation alone) I actually began to get used to God’s Presence and manifestations of power. I don’t mean that I took God for granted as much as I stopped shaking every time I felt God.
During the end of that season, I moved my focus away from evangelism and power back to Counseling and Pastoring. After all, these are the callings God has laid on my shoulders. I stopped focusing on revival every day of the week and got back to the more mundane, but necessary, aspects of leading the Church. During that season, those who wanted to see God’s revival power touch even more people began to reach out to other communities and congregations with the message of holiness and renewal. I had no problem whatsoever with that. But then they began to chastise me because I didn’t want to go with them everywhere to minister God’s power. They accused me of quenching the Spirit of God. They were annoyed that I would “play church” while God was doing something tremendously important. In short, they could not see anything beyond revival. Revival and its fruit were all that mattered to them, and anyone who could not see this was “out of touch with God”.
I admit, it hurt deeply and I consciously stopped associating with the people who did this. I even acted as if revival didn’t matter any longer. Of course, that isn’t true; revival means as much to me now as it ever did. But I was reacting to Gift Transference and the implication that I was out of touch with God because I didn’t go along with their viewpoint. I stopped trusting anyone who talked about revival, I deliberately ignored things that were going on around the country which hinted at more revival and avoided preaching on topics that might lead to a human-inspired repetition of the things we had experienced during days of God’s Power. It was a wrong reaction and I have since re-embraced what God did during those days. But I didn’t forget that ugly feeling I had when certain people laid their schtick on me.
I only wish I had never done that to anyone else. But lately God has fastened my gaze on the many formats in which I have used my Pride to practice Gift Transference. I have employed it with beliefs about: Cell Church, Full Gospel teachings, Hearing God’s voice, Prayer and Intercession and most lately, the Unity of the church. It is not just that I have a burden for each of these foci. There is nothing wrong with that. But I find that I can look at anyone who does not feel as burdened as I am as out of touch with God in that area. I see a disease that creeps in my heart when I do that: an attitude of superiority that relegates other people to the place where I heap scorn. I do. I scorn people in my heart who will not or cannot see the burden I see.
What happens when I do that? God drifts away from being involved in my thoughts and stops giving me input in my burdens. Therefore, I have to carry the burden alone and it no longer feels like a light burden. Believe me, it is not worth it.
Search your own heart. Where do you practice Gift Transference? Is it with parenting, marriage, your job, your ministry, your burdens, your theology, with money, with computer ability, with politics? Notice the creep of attitude sickness?